考研网,考研考生的精神家园。祝大家考研成功 梦想成真!
网站公告 |
您现在的位置: 教育频道-新都网 >> 考研 >> 考研英语 >> 专项训练 >> 正文

【每日一练】考研英语阅读2(4.20)

作者:佚名    文章来源:跨考教育    点击数:    更新时间:2020/3/12

    A deal is a deal-except, apparently ,when Entergy is involved. The company, a major energy supplier in New England, provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations.
    Instead, the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court, as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running. It’s a stunning move.
    The conflict has been surfacing since 2002, when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant, an aging reactor in Vernon. As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale, the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012. In 2006, the state went a step further, requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval. Then, too, the company went along.
    Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments, or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next. A string of accidents, including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage, raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s management– especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe. Enraged by Entergy’s behavior, the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.
    Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation, and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues. The legal issues in the case are obscure: whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power, legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend. Certainly, there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules. But had Entergy kept its word, that debate would be beside the point.
    The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state. But there should be consequences. Permission to run a nuclear plant is a poblic trust. Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States, including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth. Pledging to run Pilgrim safely, the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years. But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the company’s application, it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are worth.
    26. The phrase “reneging on”(Line 3.para.1) is closest in meaning to
    [A] condemning.
    [B] reaffirming.
    [C] dishonoring.
    [D] securing.
    27. By entering into the 2002 agreement, Entergy intended to
    [A] obtain protection from Vermont regulators.
    [B] seek favor from the federal legislature.
    [C] acquire an extension of its business license .
    [D] get permission to purchase a power plant.
    28. According to Paragraph 4, Entergy seems to have problems with its
    [A] managerial practices.
    [B] technical innovativeness.
    [C] financial goals.
    [D] business vision
    29. In the author’s view, the Vermont case will test
    [A] Entergy’s capacity to fulfill all its promises.
    [B] the mature of states’ patchwork regulations.
    [C] the federal authority over nuclear issues .
    [D] the limits of states’ power over nuclear issues.
    30. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that
    [A] Entergy’s business elsewhere might be affected.
    [B] the authority of the NRC will be defied.
    [C] Entergy will withdraw its Plymouth application.
    [D] Vermont’s reputation might be damaged.
    答案: 26.C 27.D 28.A 29.D 30.A
    

(责任编辑:admin)


查看更多关于的文章
快速导航
培训信息
特别说明
    由于各方面情况的不断调整与变化,新都教育所提供的招生和考试信息仅供参考,敬请考生以权威部门公布的正式信息为准。
版权声明
    凡本网注明“来源:新都教育”的所有作品,版权均属于新都网,未经本网授权不得转载、摘编或利用其它方式使用上述作品。已经本网授权使用作品的,应在授权范围内使用,并注明“来源:新都教育”。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其相关法律责任。
  凡本网注明“来源:XXXXX(非新都教育)”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。
  如作品内容、版权等存在问题,请在两周内同本网联系,联系邮箱:newdu2004@tom.com
  本网欢迎原创作品投稿,投稿邮箱:newdu2004@tom.com
  • 考研栏目导航
  • 招考资讯
    考试新闻
    招生简章
    考试大纲
    考研政策
    分数线及成绩
    录取调剂
    院校信息
    专业介绍
    综合新闻
    公告通知
    考研政治
    政治指导
    马克思主义基本原理概论
    毛泽东思想和社会主义理论
    中国近现代史纲要
    思想道德修养与法律基础
    形势与政策以及当代世界经济与政治
    复习方法
    历年真题
    模拟试题
    专项训练
    考研英语
    英语指导
    词汇
    语法长难句
    阅读理解
    写作
    完型填空
    翻译
    新题型
    复习方法
    历年真题
    模拟试题
    专项训练
    考研数学
    数学指导
    高等数学
    线性代数
    概率论与数理统计
    公式定理
    复习方法
    历年真题
    模拟试题
    专项训练
    考研专业课
    综合指导
    计算机学科专业基础综合
    植物生理学与生物化学
    动物生理学与生物化学
    教育学专业基础综合
    心理学专业基础综合
    历史学基础
    西医综合
    中医综合
    化学
    日语
    俄语
    其它专业课
    复习方法
    历年真题
    模拟试题
    专项训练
    专业硕士
    管理类联考综合能力
    法硕联考专业基础
    法硕联考综合
    经济类联考综合能力
    考研复试
    综合辅导
    综合辅导
    真题解读
    专家访谈
    专家解读
    备考经验
    经验技巧
    考研故事
    综合辅导
    考研网,考研门户网站,提供考研院校信息,考研论坛,报考指南,招生简章,复习资料,专业试卷,考研题库,考研政治,考研英语,考研数学,考研分数,考研调剂,考研经验,考研心情等考研信息。
    Copyright © 2004-2009 Newdu.com All Rights Reserved 京ICP备09058993号
    本站为非经营性网站,收藏资料纯属个人爱好,若有问题请联系管理员:newdu2004@tom.com